Summary:
Denmark is a major government donor of humanitarian and development funds to NGOs engaged in intense political advocacy campaigns directed against Israel – including Al-Dameer, Al-Haq, Badil, B´Tselem, ICAHD and PCHR. Many of these NGOs actively support Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) and employ the rhetoric of human rights, international law and apartheid to delegitimize and isolate Israel internationally. NGO Monitor´s detailed research reveals that many of these organizations benefit from Danish funding through multiple channels: direct funding, government-funded Danish NGOs and other European bodies. Such funding is inconsistent with the stated goals of Denmark´s development agency and government, "strengthening democracy, good governance and human rights."
- DanChurchAid (DCA), a recipient of over $30 million from the Danish government, partners with and funds highly political NGOs that participate in the Durban strategy of isolating Israel through Boycott, Divestment and Sanction (BDS) campaigns, including BADIL, Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR), and the World Council of Churches (WCC).
- DCA closely identifies with BADIL, which promotes the "Right of Return" and organized "a year-long campaign of public awareness-raising and education about the Nakba and Israel´s discriminatory Apartheid-like regime over the Palestinian people."
- As the head of a multi-donor secretariat, Mu'assasat, Denmark helped fund 24 NGOs in Israel and Palestinian Authority. Of note, Al-Haq promotes BDS and decries Israel's independence as "Naqba"; Defence for Children International / Palestine Section (DCI/PS) misuses international law and human rights rhetoric to condemn Israel, and falsely accuses Israel of deliberate attacks and "massacres"; Gisha misrepresents Israel's responsibility toward Gaza under international law, opening up Israel to unwarranted criticism.
- Many NGOs also indirectly receive Danish funds through EU mechanisms, including the European Instrument for Human Rights and Democracy (EIDHR) and the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN). EMHRN, is based in Copenhagen and provides a platform for and promotes the views of problematic and radical NGOs, including PCHR, Al-Haq, Al-Mezan, Public Committee against Torture in Israel (PCATI), and Adalah.
Background: The Danish International Development Agency (Danida)
"Denmark
is one of the largest international donors to the Palestinians […]
In 2007 alone, Danish assistance amounted to approximately 35,5
million USD (or almost 180 million DKK)."
–
Representative Office of Denmark, Ramallah
Danish
foreign aid and international development funds are distributed by
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs through the Danish International
Development Agency (Danida).
According to Denmark´s official website,
development assistance constitutes at least 0.8 percent of its GNP,
making Denmark one of the world´s major donors. While Africa remains
the primary focus, "Gaza/The West Bank" is listed as
another main recipient of development aid, having received 73,450,000
Danish Crowns (DKK) (≈ $15.5 million) in 2007.[1] Thirteen percent of this sum, 5.02 million DKK (≈ $1 million)
in project assistance and 4.83 million DKK (≈ $1 million) in
humanitarian assistance, is channeled through Danish NGOs.[2] Denmark
is also "one of the largest donors to the United
Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near
East (UNRWA). In the last five years, Denmark has thus
contributed more than 65 million USD to the regular budget and
emergency appeals of UNRWA, including more than 14 million USD in
2007 alone."[3]
In this
area, Denmark´s stated goal is:
"the
strengthening of democracy, good governance and human rights in the
oPt [like many NGOs and development agencies, the Danish government
has adopted the politicized term OPT – occupied Palestinian
territory – to refer to this disputed area]. Therefore, Denmark
actively supports a number of vital Palestinian institutions involved
in this endeavour."
Examples
of "vital Palestinian institutions" which receive
"significant financial assistance" from Denmark include the Palestinian
Central Elections Commission and the Palestinian
Independent Commission for Citizens´ Rights ("the Palestinian Ombudsman").
In 2007, Danida also extended comprehensive financial support
to the Palestine
Liberation Organization Negotiations Affairs Department,
a political organization that promotes
an anti-Israel political agenda, and uses demonizing
rhetoric such as "apartheid", while denying the legitimacy of Israel as a Jewish
state.
Denmark
also directs funds through Danish NGOs that claim to focus on
reducing poverty,[4] and these NGOs are regarded as important partners of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. These NGOs are used to channel emergency
humanitarian relief,[5] as during the 2006 Lebanon War.[6] In 2007, the total budget for Danish NGO development was 932.4
million DKK (≈ $197 million).[7] Humanitarian assistance through NGOs was 407.1 million DKK (≈
$86 million).[8]
The three
main frameworks for funding of highly politicized NGOs are
DanChurchAid (DCA), Mu´assasat (the Multi-donor Secretariat) and its
successor, and Danish government funding via the European Union,
including support for the EMHRN, which is based in Copenhagen. In the
following report, we will examine the available information
(reflecting limited transparency from the Danish government)[9] on each of these frameworks.
Danish
Funding through DanChurchAid (DCA)
DanChurchAid (DCA), a major Danish humanitarian NGO "rooted
in the Danish National Evangelical Lutheran Church,"
aims to "assist the poorest of the poor" and is funded through private donations, foundations, Danida,
the UN, the EU and other bilateral donors.
In 2007, the
Danish government provided 176 million DKK (≈ $37 million) in
funding to DCA.[10] In the first half of 2008, the amount was $16 million, which was
16.5 percent of Denmark´s funding for humanitarian aid allocated to
date.
DCA works
multilaterally – with close ties to the World
Council of Churches (WCC) – as well as
bilaterally with local churches, church councils and civil
("folkelige") organizations.[11] The WCC is a major
supporter and leader of the anti-Israel boycott
and divestment campaign. It is active in efforts to condemn Israel at
the UN and funds the Ecumenical Accompaniment
Programme in Palestine and Israel (EAPPI).
EAPPI has demonstrated an anti-Israel agenda, especially in
publications such as "40
Years of Occupation" with an article
advocating illegal and inflammatory activities to "end the
occupation" – including hacking government websites,
commemorating "Naqba" and recognizing the "Right of
Return." The WCC hosted the 2006 "global
advocacy week concerning the situation in Palestine and Israel,"
including "solidarity visits with Christian
Peacemaker Teams in Hebron," a "settlement
tour with ICAHD"
and an opportunity to "witnes[s] the destruction in Jenin
Refugee Camp."
DCA’s
international aid framework focuses on 12 areas, including
Israel/Palestine,[12] and DCA partners include local churches, development programs, advocacy groups, and
some of the most politicized NGOs (see appendix 1 for complete list):
-
BADIL – BADIL is one of the most active NGOs in promoting
extreme Palestinian political positions in the context of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, using a distorted
history of the Palestinian refugee issue, and emphasizing the
so-called right of return." It
is a signatory to an August 2002 call to boycott
Israel, which repeats
the NGO Declaration of the 2001 Durban
conference. In
November 2007, BADIL announced that it would lead the "Nakba 60
Campaign" – "a year-long campaign of public
awareness-raising and education about the Nakba and Israel´s
discriminatory Apartheid-like regime over the Palestinian people in
the 1967 OPT, Israel and in exile." BADIL has received Danish funding through two channels --
DanChurchAid and Mu´assasat (see below).
An April 2006 report,
conducted by DanChurchAid and Trocaire and then published with permission by Badil, demonstrates
DanChurchAid´s close identification with BADIL, especially in
recognition of BADIL´s role in promoting the "Right of Return."
The evaluators also praise BADIL´s "important role in the
coordination and launching of the BDS campaign which seems to lack
coordination at the national level."[13]
- B´Tselem - B´Tselem is an Israeli political group that was founded "to
change Israeli policy in the Occupied Territories,"
using the language of human rights. Despite
such clear political aims, B´Tselem receives considerable
international funding, mainly from European governments. This NGO received 693,822 DKK (≈
$140,000) from DanChurchAid in 2006,[14] and DanChurchAid remains on its current donor
list. B’Tselem
also has received Danish funding through Mu´assasat (see below) and
via the European Instrument for Human Rights and Democracy (EIDHR).
- Palestinian
Center for Human Rights (PCHR) – The activities of PCHR are frequently political, promoting an anti-Israel
agenda in the media and
international frameworks. PCHR
routinely accuses Israel of committing "war crimes",
"ethnic cleansing" and "collective punishment" and is active in boycott and divestment campaigns against Israel
(See detailed NGO
Monitor report). Although PCHR documents
intra-Palestinian human rights abuses, this NGO is also a key
proponent of the Durban
Strategy. In addition to DanChurchAid funding,
PCHR has received money from Denmark through Mu’assasat and
EIDHR.
- East Jerusalem YMCA – While YMCA/YWCA activities are generally non-partisan, in 2005 it launched an
ongoing Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions
Campaign with
YMCA Palestine.
DanChurchAid and BDS
Despite
supporting NGOs active in Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) –
WCC, BADIL, PCHR and East Jerusalem YMCA – DCA claims to "NOT
support a boycott of Israeli products." At the
same time, "DanChurchAid is letting the consumer decide for him
or herself what to buy and what not to buy." In the estimation
of DCA´s evaluator of BADIL´s efforts, "DanChurchAid
does not believe boycott to be morally wrong, but it does not believe
that a general boycott will be effective."
Danish
Funding to Palestinian Political NGOs Through Mu´assasat (the
Multi-donor Secretariat)
Denmark
funding for NGOs has also been channeled through multi-national
frameworks that support numerous Palestinian organizations. In 2006,
Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland jointly established a multi-donor NGO secretariat, Mu’assasat ("Institutions"), in Gaza and the West Bank, with Danida as
the lead donor.[15] Mu´assasat was created to "[strengthen] the performance, outcome and strategic outreach
of NGO programmes in human rights and good governance (HR/GG),
improving coordination among HR & GG NGOs, and improving their
internal performance in terms of accountability and organizational
governance."
(Mu´assasat ceased to exist and its website disappeared, along with
other information, when its management company, Copenhagen
Development Consultancy failed in July 2007.) As discussed below, a
second attempt is scheduled to begin operation in July 2008.[16]
During its brief initial existence, Mu'assasat assisted a number of NGOs that exacerbate conflict, and whose agendas deviated
substantially from the humanitarian claims. The Director, Khalil
Nakhleh, who had served as a consultant to the European Commission, and as an
official of the Palestinian
Ministry of Education, often
promoted this anti-Israel agenda. In a speech in Ramallah at Sabeel´s
6th International Conference "The Forgotten Faithful" on
November 6, 2006, Nakhleh
accused Israel of carrying out "ethnic cleansing" and a
"system of apartheid and an ideology of exclusion," and
proposed an international "coalition of the committed"
against Israeli "apartheid," which "should
discard and reject the often repeated slogan of a 2-state solution."
According
to the website of the Representative Office in Ramallah (edited December 13, 2007),
Denmark provided support for more than 20 Palestinian human
rights and “good governance” NGOs through Mu´assasat. A
June 10, 2008 phone conversation between NGO Monitor and Projects
Responsible/Director in the Danish Mission Mrs. Rima Majaj confirmed
that Denmark had funded 24 local NGOs while active in Mu´assasat.
(See Appendix 2 for the complete list.) Funding for these
programs and NGOs was $5,484,000.[17]
However,
as NGO Monitor’s research shows, many of these NGOs focus on
agendas that exacerbate the Israeli-Arab conflict through their
political campaigning against Israel:
- Al
Dameer – Gaza often engages in the demonization
of Israel, and promotes a "right
to resist". It is a member of the Palestinian
NGO Network (PNGO), which was instrumental in
producing many of the preparatory documents for the Durban 2001
conference and calling for embargoes on Israel.
- Al-Haq claims to be "an independent Palestinian non-governmental human
rights organisation", but the evidence reflects its leadership
role in political campaigning. It was an active participant in the 2001
Durban Conference, and lists "participation
in…activities regarding boycott, divestment, and sanctions"
(BDS) amongst its objectives. Al Haq’s General Director,
Shawan Jabarin, has been linked to the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). Its website openly identifies Israel´s independence as "Naqba"
("catastrophe").
- Badil – see entry above
- Defence for Children International (DCI) / Palestine Section – The activities of DCI are highly politicized and exploit the rhetoric
of human rights to demonize Israel As NGO
Monitor’s detailed research has shown, DCI/PS has a
history of anti-Israel political campaigning in the UN and other
frameworks. In a statement to the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) on September 29,
2007, DCI/PS condemned Israel for “deliberate targeting of
civilians” in Lebanon, "terrorizing the civilian
population" in Gaza and "collective punishment."
This submission misappropriates international law, distorts the
context of the conflict, and demonizes Israel through false
accusations, all while ignoring the impact of intra-Palestinian
violence on children. DCI/PS also continues to promote the myth of
the “Jenin massacre” on its website, including a statement on the "horror" of the "Israeli army massacre in
Jenin refugee camp" in 2002, despite widespread rejection
of this narrative.
- Mossawa – Mossawa engages in political and legal
campaigns that delegitimize Israel as a Jewish state with charges of racism and other
pejoratives. Mossawa is influential in international forums, and has
worked with Human
Rights Watch, Amnesty, FIDH and Habitat
International. Mossawa also received EIDHR
funding concurrent with Mu´assasat support.[18]
-
Physicians
for Human Rights (Israel) – PHR-I is a highly political organization that often condemns Israeli government policies. Its
mission statement claims
that it "works to implement [justice, equality and mutual
assistance] on a practical level struggling not only to aid the
individual, but also to change the policies that are at the base of
human rights abuses." PHR-I is involved in political campaigns
that erase the context of Palestinian terror, and as a result
the Israel Physician´s Union halted
cooperative activities. In May 2008, PHR-I admitted
research mistakes when the organization falsely
reported that a Gaza cancer patient died while
waiting for a permit to enter Israel. In addition to
Mu´assasat funding, EIDHR provided PHR-I with €665,967 in the
period of May 2002 to February 2006.
- Gisha
- Gisha´s
reports and legal actions filed in Israeli courts promote a
selective human rights agenda, distort international law, use
"apartheid" and "collective punishment"
rhetoric, and strip away the context of Palestinian terror. A
January 2007 document, "Disengaged
Occupiers: The Legal Status of Gaza," posits
that Israel continues to "occupy" Gaza after the 2005
Disengagement, an opinion that informs
and shapes Gisha´s approach to Israel´s actions vis a
vis Gaza. As NGO
Monitor has firmly established, "This argument
is false as a matter of fact and a matter of law, and largely
parrots a
´legal´ opinion circulated by the PLO shortly prior
to Israel’s disengagement." By downplaying Palestinian
terrorism in Gaza and misrepresenting human rights issues, Gisha
contributes to the impression that Israel imposes restrictions of
the Palestinians without cause or purpose.
Mu´assasat
also extended small grant support. As of February 26, 2008,[19] the small grant support (total of 140,000 USD) went to:
According to information obtained by NGO Monitor, some of the NGOs are continuing to receive funds from the donor states, including Denmark, although no details are available. A new multidonor program was scheduled to begin operating on July 1, 2008, with Switzerland – through the Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC) – replacing Denmark as the lead donor. The level of Danish involvement remains unclear.
Danish
NGO funding through the European Union
Note: A
detailed list of EU-funded Israeli and Palestinian NGOs can be found
in NGO Monitor’s Europe’s
Hidden Hand (April 2008).
Danish contributions to development cooperation within the European
Union account for almost 15 percent of Denmark´s
multilateral development assistance, or approximately 7 percent of
Denmark´s total aid budget. Many local NGOs benefit from European
Union funding through the European Instrument for Human Rights and
Democracy (EIDHR), and thus, indirectly, from Danish funds. Moreover,
the Euro-Mediterranean
Human Rights Network (EMHRN) receives 80 percent of its funding from the EU. EMHRN, based in Copenhagen, also receives direct funding from Denmark.
EMHRN
encompasses over eighty NGOs, which claim to promote human rights. It
receives an annual budget of approximately €1 million via EIDHR,
under the general framework of supporting "democracy, good
governance and rule of law." EMHRN’s official mandate is
to develop "synergies between regional and local human rights
work, the human rights instruments of the Barcelona process as well
as the wider Arab world." EMHRN funds are allocated to
conferences, research, and educational materials produced for its
member NGOs. EMHRN assists these NGOs in influencing public opinion
by providing them access to Europe’s policymaking community.
Other
EMHRN activities include facilitating dialogue and assistance among
its members and lobbying to advance the policy goals of affiliated
NGOs. The EMHRN members from Israel and the PA consist exclusively of
NGOs active in advancing Arab and Palestinian political goals. As
shown in NGO Monitor’s detailed analyses, many of these NGOs
are active in promoting the strategy of boycotts, divestment and
sanctions (BDS) based on the final declaration of the NGO Forum at
the 2001 Durban Conference. EMHRN reports often contribute to this
process, advance specious Palestinian claims and erase the context of
terror against Israel, thereby exacerbating the perception of the
conflict in countries where EMHRN is widely received, especially
across North Africa (Source: Europe’s
Hidden Hand, pp. 23-25).
EMHRN
provides a platform for and promotes the views of its partner
NGOs, which include:
- Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) – see above.
PCHR has been a member of the EMHRN since
1999.
- Al–Haq
– see above. Al-Haq has been a member of the EMHRN since
2003.
- Al
Mezan – Al
Mezan´s activities reflect a radical anti-Israel agenda, including promoting claims of
"Israeli war crimes", such as this article,
where "Al Mezan confirms that the IOF have committed war crimes
violating the texts of international humanitarian law."
Al-Mezan also promotes accusations of apartheid, such as in this report (page 7) which states that checkpoints are a "place
where the military humiliate[s] [Palestinians], reinforcing feelings
of hatred. In reality, the checkpoint embodies an awful apartheid
policy as facts on the ground prove." Al Mezan has been a
member of the EMHRN since
2006, the same year it received funding from
Mu´assasat (see below).
- PCATI - Public
Committee against Torture in Israel PCATI´s activities are highly political, and its campaigns extend
far beyond the specifics of its mission
statement. In
December 2006, the Israeli High Court rejected PCATI´s petition on targeted killings, on the grounds of legitimate
self-defense against terror. PCATI has been a member of the EMHRN since
2001.
- B´Tselem
– see above. B´Tselem has been a member of the EMHR since
1997.
- Adalah
- Adalah published a so-called "Democratic
Constitution" in March 2007, which calls for the
end of Israel as a democratic society with a Jewish character (see Europe’s
Hidden Hand, pp 22-23). Adalah has been a member
of the EMHRN since
1997.
Conclusion
The Danish Foreign Ministry, through its international development
agency – Danida – DanChurchAid, Mu´assasat, and via EU
frameworks, provides significant funding to some of the most
politicized NGOs. DanChurchAid, which receives tens of millions of
dollars annually from the Danish government, supports and partners
with active participants in the BDS campaign against Israel.
Mu´assasat, which is being revived under the leadership of the Swiss,
funded NGOs that distort international law and human rights rhetoric
to condemn Israel. Such funding is inconsistent with Danish
government policies and commitments to promoting peace and
compromise, and does not help in attaining the stated goals of
"strengthening democracy, good governance and human rights."
NGO Monitor sent this report to officials from the Danish Representative Office in Ramallah and DanChurchAid. While the Danish government did not respond, DanChurchAid did send comments (to read DanChurchAid´s letter, click here). To read NGO Monitor´s reply to DanChurchAid, click here.
3 The Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs carries out bilateral NGO
assistance in the fields of development and humanitarian aid through
Danish NGOs and relevant UN-organizations. Funds are also provided
for direct governmental activities, such as sending out of personnel
through the "Internationale Humanitaere Beredskab" (IHB -
"International Humanitarian Emergency Unit") and efforts
made by "Beredskabsstyrelsen" ("Emergency
Management") and the Danish defense forces (Danidas
NGO-Samarbejde 2007, page 5).
NGOs also receive financial resources for specific projects beyond
the NGO and humanitarian allocations, including the "Det
Arabiske Initiativ" ("The Arab Initiative"),
"Naboskabsprogrammet" ("The Neighborhood Program"),
"rekvirerede opgaver," as well as resources for activities
that are financed through the "Oblysningsbevillingen"
("The Information Grant").
7 Danidas
NGO-Samarbejde 2007, page 5. This was 10.4 percent of
Danish bilateral development assistance and 6.7 percent of the
global Danish aid funding in 2007.
8 This was 36 percent of the total humanitarian assistance and 2.9
percent of the total Danish assistance in 2007.
9 The Danish government provided NGO Monitor with a
comprehensive list of NGOs funded by Danida, through 2007. However,
complete information on other Danish funding instruments for Israeli
and Palestinian NGOs was not provided.
10 Danidas
NGO-Samarbejde 2007,page 30. 112.127 million DKK (≈
$23.7 million) for development assistance and 64.581 million DKK (≈
$13.64 million) for humanitarian aid, 4 percent of total Danish
humanitarian aid for 2007.
14 This information is based on a July 9, 2008 e-mail from a
DanChurchAid official. However, in documents received from the
Israeli Registry of Non-profit Organizations, B´Tselem reported only
$7,508 in donations from DCA.
15 Phone conversation between Deputy Head of Mission of the
Representative Office of Denmark, Ramallah, Rasmus Grue Christensen,
and NGO Monitor, June 16, 2008. The secretariat was also set up on
behalf of Austria, according to the Austrian
Development Agency.
16 On July 15, 2008, representatives from Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden
and the Netherlands signed
a $6 million agreement with the NGO Development
Center (NDC) to manage "Karameh," the new secretariat. The
potential for Danish influence over NGOs funding in this new body is
unclear.
17 E-mail from Deputy Head of Mission of the Representative Office of
Denmark, Ramallah, Rasmus Grue Christensen, to NGO Monitor, February
26, 2008
19 E-mail from Deputy Head of Mission of the Representative Office of
Denmark, Ramallah, Rasmus Grue Christensen, to NGO Monitor, February
26, 2008, with follow up regarding the Stop the Wall Campaign on
July 15, 2008.