English|עברית|Français
RSS research
RSS News
contact

NGO INDEX

 

 

BDS IN THE PEWS

 

 

 

NGO Monitor Reports


"EU-funded NGOs lead anti-Israel events on anniversary of 1967 war"



Many politicized and EU-funded NGOs that contribute to the demonization of Israel are holding activities and publishing reports coinciding with the fortieth anniversary of the 1967 War. These activities portray a one-sided view of events, repeating the Palestinian narrative and providing a distorted history of the war. These events are further exempleries of biased political agendas that are inconsistent with promoting universal human rights, and highlight the danger of government funding for these NGOs.

Amnesty International Report for 2006



Powerful NGOs such as Amnesty International have major political impacts, and often promote narrow agendas that are inconsistent with universal human rights. As part of NGO Monitor´s continuing assessment of this bias, we have systematically analyzed the relative emphasis on Israel in comparison to other countries in the Middle East in 2006. This research clearly demonstrates that in 2006, Amnesty International focused disproportionately on condemnations of Israel and singled out Israel to a far greater extent than Iran, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Egypt, and other chronic abusers of human rights. This evidence of a clear political agenda is consistent with other studies and examples of Amnesty International´s bias and lack of credibility.

World Bank report on Palestinians based on false NGO reports and anti-Israel bias



On May 9, 2007, the World Bank published a report entitled “Movement and Access Restrictions in the West Bank: Uncertainty and Inefficiency in the Palestinian Economy.” As the following analysis demonstrates, the claims made by the so-called "technical team" of the World Bank’s report lack credibility, and are based entirely on the publications of a variety of highly politicized groups and NGOs and UN OCHA. As a result, the allegations and analysis contained in this report cannot reliably be used by policy makers attempting to deal with the challenges posed by the combination of ongoing Palestinian violence and economic crisis. In addition, this report is inconsistent with the World Bank´s apolitical humanitarian mission, and reflects negatively on this institution.

HRW/FIDH/OMCT statement on NGO official linked to PFLP



On May 2 2007, three major NGOs -- Human Rights Watch, FIDHand the World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) -- published a joint press release calling on Israel to lift the travel ban placed on Shawan Jabarin, the General Director of Al-Haq. The statement alleges that Jabarin was barred by Israel from attending the annual Congress of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) in Lisbon on April 19, 2007, and that "Israeli authorities have not explained why the restrictions are in place". NGO Monitor´s analysis of this statement shows these NGOs entirely erase Jarabin´s links to the PFLP and the legitimate security concerns. The result is a selective research and ideologically biased analysis, similar to others analyzed in previous NGO Monitor reports.

Claims in B´tselem/Hamoked report lack credibility



B´tselem and HaMoked released a report claiming that the Israel Security Agency continues to torture security detainees in violation of a Court decision. The Israeli Ministry of Justice (MOJ) issued a nine page letter detailing the questionable methodology and lack of verifiable sources in the report, and concluding that the report is "fraught with mistakes, groundless claims and inaccuracies." This public rebuttal reflects an important development in Israeli government policy with respect to such politicized NGO reports.

Alternatives (Canada) Update: Government Funding for Radical Politics



With half of its funding from the Canadian government, Montreal-based Alternatives continues support anti-Israel political activity. Through media statements and in cooperation with groups such as the PNGO, Alternative Information Center, Palestinian Agricultural Relief Committee (PARC), and Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD), Alternatives promotes the demonization of Israel, contributes to the conflict, and requires greater scrutiny from the Canadian government.


"Mise à jour d´Alternatives (Canada): Fonds gouvernementaux pour des politiques radicales"



The Role of the UN´s "ReliefWeb" in Promoting Biased NGO Reports



ReliefWeb is a UN-based and funded information service that works closely with NGOs to promote their reports, agendas and campaigns under the guise of humanitarian aid and human rights. While the official UN affiliation provides the image of credibility and objectivity, as the following analysis demonstrates, many of the reports on Arab-Israeli issues posted on the site are copied directly from biased NGOs pursuing an anti-Israel agenda. As a result, ReliefWeb should also be viewed as biased and unreliable.

Pax Christi: Aiding Peace?



Pax Christi International (PCI) is a Catholic organization and its International President is Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Michael Sabbah. While PCI claims to promote reconciliation and the defense of universal human rights, its activities related to the Middle East reflect an adoption of the Palestinian narrative and utilize international legal and human rights rhetoric to delegitmize Israel. The UK branch of the organization is active in the boycott and sanctions movement against Israel and its website promotes radical NGOs and anti-Israel publications. The result of these activities is to further conflict, in sharp contrast to the claimed objectives.

EU Funding Promotes ICAHD´s Ideological Agenda



The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) claims to be “a non-violent, direct-action group … to oppose and resist Israeli demolition of Palestinian houses in the Occupied Territories.” A recipient of EU funding, ICAHD partners with radical NGOs such as Sabeel, Christian Aid, and LAW to campaign against the two-state solution, promote the “Durban Strategy” of boycotts and demonizing Israel, using terms such as "apartheid", and grossly distorting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.



 First   «  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39  »   Last 
Subscribe
follow us on twitter
friend us on facebook
At NGO Monitor
in $US
Internships
European Parliament
NGO Monitor History

 

Copyright 2014 The Amuta for NGO Responsibility - R.A. 58-0465508. All rights reserved.