Home
What's New
About NGO Monitor
Our Mission Statement
Who are We?
Aims and Objectives
About NGOs
What is an NGO?
Different Types of NGOs
How do NGOs operate?
Who funds NGOs?
Archives
Summary Reports on
    NGOs: A-Z
Previous Editions
Special Editions
Correspondence
Op-eds
NGO News Reports
Publications
Links
Issues of Importance
EU Support for Politicized
   NGO's
Durban Conference 2001
UN-HRC
Defensive Shield/Jenin
The Legality of Israel's
   Separation Barrier
Boycotts and Divestment
   Campaigns
Human Rights and
   International Law in the
   Era of Mass Terror

Special Editions

  • "Report On Human Rights Watch: A Comparative Analysis of
    Activities in the Middle East -- 2002-2004" NGO Monitor, (revised June 2005 - PDF)
    , and Appendix (documentation - PDF)


  • Update Comparing HRW's Allocation Of Resources In The Middle East - 2005 (January - June), June 23, 2005


  • Summary: In this analysis, the degree to which HRW addressed the activities of a number of major countries in the region is analyzed using a common quantitative methodology, as explained, highlighting the extreme emphasis on critical assessments of Israel. In addition, we compare the language of reports in a seven-month sample period, noting the repetition of certain key terms with respect to Israel (i.e., "violation of international law") and the relative absence of such terms in HRW's activities on the Palestinian Authority, Syria, and elsewhere. The third section analyzes the content of photographs selected to appear on HRWs website, demonstrating the use of images in the extreme and disproportionate level of attacks on Israel. We note that all of the material in this analysis is fully sourced, and can be easily verified and extended to other periods and countries.
    Updated: June 2005


  • NGO Monitor Analysis of Interview with Kenneth Roth, Head of Human Rights Watch -- 5 November 2004, the Jerusalem Post
    Summary: NGO Monitor analyzes a Jerusalem Post interview with Kenneth Roth, head of Human Rights Watch, in which he responded to evidence of bias and ideological exploitation of the rhetoric of universal human rights. Roth's claims included a number of false and unsupported statements.
    Date: November 10, 2004

  • Christian Aid: Report Uses Humanitarian Aims to Promote Political Bias
    Summary: Christian Aid claims to be a charitable and humanitarian organization, but the main focus of its activities on Arab-Israeli issues is political. Its publication, "Facts on the ground: The end of the two-state solution?", presents a simplistic and highly partisan analysis that reflects that lack of competence in this area.
    Date: October 21, 2004

  • HRW'S Report on Gaza: Lacking Credibility and Reflecting a Political Agenda
    Summary: HRW's condemnation of IDF efforts to end lethal missile smuggling into Gaza cites Palestinian "eye-witnesses", journalists, and a few "experts", in the service of the goal of delegitimizing Israeli security policy. Satellite photos not-withstanding, this is a political report without credibility.
    Date: October 18, 2004

  • UN Conference Abuses NGOs and "Civil Society" to Promote Anti-Israel Agenda
    Summary: In September 2004, the UN convened the "International Conference of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People". This gathering represents the antithesis of civil society with workshops promoting an anti-Israel agenda, thus further discrediting the UN and NGO participants.
    Date: October 5, 2004

  • The Association for the Defence of the Rights of the Internally Displaced (ADRID) - the Body Shop's Role in Exploiting Human Rights
    Summary: The Association for the Defence of the Rights of the Internally Displaced (ADRID) uses the veneer of human rights to promote an anti-Israel politicized agenda, assisted by the international cosmetics chain The Body Shop, which awarded ADRID its "Human Rights Award".
    Date: September 27, 2004

  • Asleep at the Wheel: Comparing the Performance of Human Rights NGO's on Sudan and Arab-Israeli Issues
    Summary: This article analyzes human rights NGO activity on Sudan prior to January 2003 and after, compared to the Israeli-Palestinian focus, and demonstrates the belated recognition of the tragedy in Sudan.
    Date: August 26, 2004

  • War on Want's War Against Israel
    Summary: The British charity War on Want, an explicitly political organization that uses economic issues to further its agenda, has launched a campaign in support of the effort to demonize Israel's security barrier and defense against terrorism, featuring MPs and entertainment celebrities who are asked to sign a mock "wall" denouncing Israel's policies and supporting the ICJ "advisory opinion".
    Date: August 5, 2004

  • Pierre Galand (Belgium): Using Political NGOs to Promote Demonization & Anti-Semitism in the UN & EU
    Summary: Spreading an extremist anti-American, anti-globalization and anti-Israel ideology, Belgian parliamentarian Pierre Galand travels the NGO conference network, sponsored by the United Nations and the European Union. Public NGO funding has provided Galand with visiblity and influence in promoting his private agenda, highlighting the absence of accountability in UN and EU support of NGOs.
    Date: July 28, 2004

  • Political NGOS and the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Israel's Separation Barrier: Background and Analysis
    Date: July 9, 2004

  • Al Mezan (Madison/Rafah "Sister City" Proposal)
    Summary: The Madison, Wisconsin city council is debating a proposal to "adopt" the Palestinian city of Rafah in Gaza. If approved, the Al Mezan Palestinian NGO would represent Rafah in this process. The following report provides information and analysis on Al Mezan and its activities.
    Date: July 4, 2004

  • HRW Needs Transparency and Accountability in Hiring
    Summary: In May 2004, Human Rights Watch issued employment announcements related to the Middle East. Given HRW's emphasis on the Israeli-Arab conflict and political basis of HRW officials as documented by NGO Monitor, this screening process and outcome will receive careful examination. Only a fully transparent and accountable process will help to repair HRW's credibility.
    Date: June 7, 2004

  • Analysis of NGO Statements Regarding the Violence in Gaza
    Summary: In response to the violence in Gaza, HRW, Amnesty and other NGOs have issued heavily biased and unsupported condemnations of Israel. These statements are based on unverified "eyewitness accounts" again exploit the rhetoric of international law and human rights to promote an anti-Israel political and ideological agenda.
    Date: May 24, 2004

  • EU Funding of Politicized NGOs
    Summary: The EU continues to fund numerous NGOs active in the Arab-Israeli conflict, many of which demonstrate a clear anti-Israeli political agenda, advocating Palestinian positions, ignoring the context of terrorism and conflict, and contributing to the demonization and delegitimation of Israel.
    Date: April 22, 2004

  • Activity Summary of Human Rights Watch March 2003 - March 2004
    Summary: In a study of activities between October 2000 and April 2004, HRWs reports and activities on Israel were found to be systematically and exceedingly biased. Most of the 103 reports, press releases, letters, photo essays and film festivals focus on condemning Israeli responses to terror, in comparison to only 13 that deal with Palestinian terror attacks.
    Date: April 14, 2004

  • NGO Responses to Abuse of Palestinian Children and Targeted Killing of Sheikh Yassin
    Summary: On 22 March 2004, the IDF launched the targeted killing of Hamas terrorist leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, responsible for inspiring Palestinian suicide bombers and directly involved in the murder of hundreds of Israeli civilians. On 15 and 24 March, two incidents occurred involving the use of Palestinian children by terrorist groups – an 11 year-old boy was sent to transport explosives across an Israeli checkpoint and a 16 year-old would-be suicide bomber was arrested.
    Date: March 31, 2004

  • Head of EU Delegation Responds to NGO Monitor Investigation
    Summary: The following is Part I of an exchange of letters between NGO Monitor and Ambassador Giancarlo Chevallard, Head of the EU Commission Delegation to the State of Israel and Jean Breteche, European Commission Representative for the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
    Date: January, 2004

  • Head of EU Delegation Reponds to NGO Monitor Investigation
    Summary: The following is Part II of an exchange of letters between NGO Monitor and Ambassador Giancarlo Chevallard, Head of the EU Commission Delegation to the State of Israel and Jean Breteche, European Commission Representative for the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
    Date: January, 2004

Summary Reports on NGOs: A-Z
Archive of Previous Editions
Search the NGO Monitor Website
Ford Foundation Update
Summary Report on Christian Aid
Summary Report HRW
Images from NGOs

Oxfam's Apology
Subscribe Newsletter
NGO Monitor Created by: