NGO Monitor Analysis (Vol. 3 No. 1) 15 September 2004
MADRE - Ford Funded NGO Leads Demonization of Israel
Click here for printer friendly
version
Founded in 1983, and based in the United States with 23,000 members,
MADRE describes itself
as an "international women's human rights organization that works
in partnership with women's community based groups…to develop long
term solutions to the crisis they face."
In practice, however, MADRE's activities reflect an extremist political
and ideological agenda that also justifies terror. Nevertheless,
and despite its high-profile role in the 2001
Conference on Racism at Durban, MADRE received $350,000
of funding from the Ford Foundation in 2003 (There is no list
of sponsors on the MADRE website.) Sarah Leah Whitson, who is currently
the Executive Director of the Middle East and North Africa division
of Human
Rights Watch, was affiliated
with MADRE, providing another example, along with Joe Stork and
Gary Sick, of the primacy of anti-Israel bias in HRW's Middle East
activities.
The 2001 Durban Conference and beyond
MADRE was a major
participant in the NGO forum of the Durban Conference on Racism
in 2001, including a highly biased presentation on the history
of Palestinian refugees. MADRE's political agenda is also reflected
in the partnership formed with the Palestinian NGO Ibdaa, a "refugee
community center" engaged in virulently anti-Israel activities.
Ibdaa
also had a prominent role at the Durban conference, and supplies
much of MADRE's anti-Israel materials.
Historical Distortion
In examining MADRE's publications on the conflict, extreme
distortions in the service of a political agenda are commonplace.
Reports accuse Israel of using F-16s to destroy "houses, mosques,
kindergartens, clinics" and make the false claim that "half of all
the land [in West Bank] will be swallowed by Israel." Its background
resource to the conflict is a farce. There is no reference to
Arab terror attacks, no historical background, and Israel is consistently
portrayed as responsible for the 1948 and 1967 Wars. MADRE repeats
the canard blaming
Zionism for anti-Semitism, and portrays the Oslo
process as an anti-Palestinian accord designed to consolidate
Israeli control over the West Bank and Gaza, a claim repeated in
a MADRE report "Hunger
in Palestine".
MADRE's dominant political agenda is also seen in the differences
in the distribution of its reports. Between December 1999 and April
2003, this organization issued 17 reports on the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict as compared to 13 on all of Latin America, eleven on Iraq,
five on women's health and three on Africa during this period. The
content of these reports reflect the continued ideology of delegitimization
of Israel.
Excusing terror in order to demonize Israel
In its "Palestine
Country Overview", the post-Oslo violence beginning in September
2000 is termed a "Palestinian struggle" versus an Israeli "military
offensive characterized by grave and massive violations of Palestinian
human rights." Rejecting Israel's security concerns, MADRE places
Palestinian terror in the context of the "right
to resist military occupation". Marking International Women's
Day on March 8, 2002, a MADRE
statement ignores Palestinian terror and the murder of hundreds
of Israelis, while charging Israel with assassinating "activists"
or "leaders" and building an "Apartheid Wall", which
is falsely labeled "electrified". This is a blatant
propaganda text, including sentences such as "Israeli forces
have responded to Palestinian demands for independence by attacking
with US made Apache helicopters and F-16 fighter jets..." A MADRE
press statement
of April 2, 2002 during the height of the Palestinian terror campaign
continues this theme: "Israel is killing unarmed women, children
and old men…" and adding the grossly unethical statement that "Israelis
killed by Palestinian suicide bombers are victims of Sharon's policy."
MADRE's amoral equivalence between Israeli victims and Palestinian
perpetrators is demonstrated in its view that "[state]
terrorism is the essence of Sharon's policy."
Despite MADRE's claim to be a human rights organization, there
is no mention of Palestinian violation of Israeli rights through
terror or encouragement of childhood martyrdom and official incitement.
Violence and
terror are excused as part of Palestinian culture and nationalist
struggle. MADRE's only mention of human rights violations within
the Palestinian Authority is in a
short letter of December 10, 1999 asking "honored President
Arafat" to reassess his incarceration of twenty political opponents.
In summary, MADRE's radical political agenda and demonization of
Israel are in direct contrast to its claimed objective "to develop
a long term solution to the crisis". Women's rights issues are discarded
in favor of carrying out a blatant anti-Israel politicized agenda.
If it continues to fund this organization, the Ford Foundation is
ignoring its own guidelines.
Samuel Chester
|