14 July 2005:
NGOs Behind Anti-Israel Divestment Campaign
Click
here for printer friendly version
The divestment campaign has become the latest political instrument
of the drive designed to progressively delegitimize Israel in international
frameworks based on the
2001 "Durban strategy". This campaign is being conducted by
Protestant Church groups, such as the World
Council of Churches, the Presbyterians,
the Anglican
Church, and the UCC.
As in the Durban conference itself, as well as the university
boycott efforts in the UK, the NGO network is playing a central role in this
divestment movement. Groups such as Sabeel,
a radical Palestinian religio-political organization supported by groups such
as the Mennonite
Central Committee, have provided the allegations and language repeated in
many of the divestment declarations issued by church associations.
Indeed, divestment has been a core theme in the radical anti-Israel activities
of NGOs claiming to promote human rights and assistance for the Palestinians,
as profiled previously by NGO Monitor. These include Ittajah,
BADIL,
Al-Mezan,
the Arab Association
for Human Rights, Nazareth (HRA), ADRID,
MIFTAH,
along with others. The long list of extremist Palestinian NGOs involved in the
divestment campaign was published on Electronic
Intifada, which also disclosed that the campaign was timed to coincide with
the "one year" anniversary of the ICJ "advisory decision" on Israel's
separation barrier. In other words, the UN General Assembly vote, which
was also led by the NGO network, was a means to the pseudo-legal ICJ process,
which, in turn, is being used to drive the political boycott and divestment
campaigns.
The funding for these political NGOs spear-heading the anti-Israel divestment
campaign comes from a variety of sources: church groups in Europe and North
America (including the Mennonite
Central Committee and Christian
Aid), government aid agencies (including Canada, Norway, Switzerland and
the EU), and foundations (such as the New
Israel Fund and the Ford
Foundation).These groups continue to exploit claims of support for civil
society and human rights in order to further narrow political objectives.
|
|
|