22 August 2005:
The Political Agenda of Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT)
Click
here for printer friendly version
The Christian Peacemaker Teams program was founded in Chicago in 1986,
as an initiative of the Mennonite
Central Committee Peace Section, the Church of the Brethren Office
of Peace and Justice, and similar groups. The CPT describes
itself as being “a nonviolent alternative to war and other
forms of lethal inter-group conflict” and aims to promote “nonviolent
institutions, skills and training for intervention in conflict situations.”
CPT is funded
primarily through donations from members of affiliated churches
based in Cleveland, Chicago, northern Indiana, the upper Midwest
(Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin), Winnipeg, Ontario, and the UK.
In
2004, donations totaled over $800,000.
CPT activities are based on short-term (7-14 day) visits by “conflict
resolution teams” to Palestinian centers, both to provide
“practical guidance to warring parties”, and to “link
communities experiencing violence with concerned individuals, churches
and groups.” One method is through creating
a forum for “social change through listening, public witness,
prayer vigils, dialogue.”
The CPT also funds longer-term “peacemaker
teams” based in these areas. These individuals return
to their home churches periodically, where they are active politically
in ”organizing, speaking, training, or other peace work within
their community.” CPT claims that, this activity serves to
“advance the cause of lasting peace by giving skilled, courageous
support to peacemakers working locally in situations of conflict.”
CPT activities related to the Arab-Israeli conflict began in 1992,
in parallel with delegations sent to Haiti and Iraq. CPT “violence
reduction workers” visited Palestinian towns, in close coordination
with political leaders, such as the mayor of Hebron. (Israelis were
largely ignored, making peace-related activities impossible.)
The number of CPT
missions in support of Palestinians has grown steadily, and
now, consists of half the worldwide CPT activity in this period.
Ten such visits are scheduled for 2005-06, including one in coordination
with the United Church of Canada and one with a Franciscan group.
Reflecting this disproportionate emphasis on the Palestinian cause,
the CPT UK websiteprovides
the contact information for six “peacemaker team” members
who are available for speaking engagements and comment on world
affairs. Of these, five had spent most of their time in contact
with Palestinian groups.
CPT publications also reflected a consistent pro-Palestinian agenda,
in sharp contrast the CPT mission statement related to nonviolent
conflict resolution. An article published by the Global Ministries,
documenting
the January 2003 CPT Ohio Conference, reflects this bias and
hostility towards Israel. While repeatedly condemning Israeli government
policies, there is no mention of the Palestinian terror campaign,
and the hundreds of murdered Israelis.
Similarly, the Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation (HCEF)
website includes an article entitled “A
Christian Peacemaker Team Member Views the Arab Israeli Conflict”,
urging CPT activists “to protect Palestinians under assault
from settlers trying to extend their illegal domains, while diffident
IDF soldiers stand by and let them.” Repeating the standard
pro-Palestinian narrative that erases the historical context, the
writer also characterizes the Palestinian people as suffering from
the “cynical cruelty of the occupation”. And a June
2005 article on “Promoting
Peace in Palestine” in a Gladwin (Michigan) newspaper
describes a CPT tour by members of the Beaverton Church of the Brethren,
reflecting the one-sided agenda of support for the Palestinian agenda,
and condemnation of Israel.
In the same way, CPT’s website, including a detailed section
on Hebron with photographs, consistently presents Palestinians
as victims, while implicitly denying Israelis the right to self-defense
against terror.
The one-sided political agenda is further highlighted in CPT’s
cooperative activities with other NGOs. These allied NGOs include
the Ecumenical
Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel (EAPPI), which
employs
such terms as “apartheid” and “war crimes”
to describe Israeli activities. (The EAPPI has relationships with
several other extremist pro-Palestinian groups such as the Alternative
Information Center, the
Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, and PENGON.)
In summary, the evidence demonstrates the vast gap between CPT’s
claims to work for peace “through non-violent means”
and its biased political agenda. CPT’s strident advocacy is
part of the NGO-led divestment
campaign designed to promote demonization and isolation of Israel
in the framework of the on-going political conflict.
The Christian Peacemaker Congress VIII, to be held in Indianapolis
from September 8 to 11, 2005, provides an opportunity to restore
the universal moral principles of human rights and to return CPT
to its declared mission of seeking peace.
Ariel Rosenzveig
|
|
|