The public summary of the Board of Inquiry report regarding the 2014 Gaza conflict was published without footnotes or accompanying evidence, making it difficult to assess the conclusions about Israeli actions and culpability.
The briefing paper published by a coalition of over 40 NGOs is fundamentally flawed, includes faulty research, false premises, and distortions of international law.
The 74-page publication, Ripe for Abuse: Palestinian Child Labor in Israeli Agricultural Settlements in the West Bank, is based on unverifiable allegations and reflects HRWs documented anti-Israel obsession.
Like most of Amnestys investigations of armed conflict, its report examining Hamas war crimes lacks professional credibility and is of limited value.
The AP's investigation into the 2014 Gaza war is highly inaccurate and relies on the claims of NGOs that are known for their blatant political agenda and hostility toward Israel.
In anticipation of the publication of Amnesty Internationals Annual Report, NGO Monitor notes that given the organizations strong ideological biases, particularly targeting Israel, journalists, diplomats, and academics must examine each claim independently.
Physicians for Human Rights- Israels medical "fact-finding" report demonstrates a serious lack of expertise, methodology and objective research, highlighting its politicized agenda of demonizing Israel.
Amnesty International's record demonstrates multiple failures and biases.
Anne Herzberg maintains that without professionalization and standardization, NGO fact-finding should be viewed as nothing more than politicized advocacy.
Copyright 2023 Institute for NGO Research - R.A. 58-0465508. All Rights Reserved.
