The human rights discourse and Israel: beyond victimhood and underdogs
Ron Dudai (‘Entryism, mimicry and victimhood work: the adoption of human rights discourse by right-wing groups in Israel’) makes the argument that ‘right-wing’ groups imitate, seek to be included in, and to exploit human rights discourse in order to pursue a ‘right-wing’ agenda. The ostensible objective of this effort is to hijack the movement from within, defend Israel and undermine the Palestinian struggle for human rights.
The choice and reliability of evidence and the argument are highly problematic, in two core dimensions. First, the reification of the ‘right–left’ dichotomy in the context of debates regarding human rights, with repeated references to ‘right-wing’ without independent, consistent and verifiable definitions or criteria. Second, according to the paradigm, those who are not sufficiently progressive cannot possibly care about human rights, and are acting on the basis of imputed motivations. Thus, these Israeli civil society organisations are falsely categorised as ‘government-aligned groups masquerading as independent civil society actors’ ‘state marionettes’ or ‘phantom organizations’.