Amnesty International: Failed Methodology, Corruption, and Anti-Israel Bias

While Amnesty International may be considered the most prestigious international NGO, the organization is tainted by a number of scandals. In addition, systematic research shows that its publications contain systematic flaws, erroneous claims, and consistent bias against Israel.

Topics

• 2014 Gaza War
• Administrative Detention
• Al Qaeda
• Antisemitism
• Apartheid Rhetoric
• Arms Embargo

• CAGE
• Deborah Hyams
• Edith Garwood
• Frank Johansson
• Gita Sahgal
• Irene Khan

• Kate Allen
• Kristyan Benedict
• Lawfare
• Saleh Hijazi
• Women's Rights

Amnesty International Report Reflects Lack of Expertise and Methodology

Amnesty International accusations are reckless, blatantly biased, and reflect the lack of a credible research fact-finding methodology. Amnesty lacks the expertise and credibility to analyze or assign blame for deaths in the context of violent confrontations in the West Bank.

Topics

• Arms Embargo
• BDS
• Pseudo-research
• Trigger-happy

A farewell to arms? NGO campaigns for embargoes on military exports: the case of the UK and Israel

Topics

• Arms Embargo
• International Law

Statement Of NGO Monitor Intl Advisory Board On Frank Johansson of Amnesty-Finlands Blog Post

Topics

• Arms Embargo
• Frank Johansson
• Ideological Bias
• NGO Monitor International Advisory Board
• Salil Shetty
• War crimes

NGO Monitor: Amnesty Plays Hamas Apologist in Gaza Report

Topics

• 2009 Gaza War
• Arms Embargo
• BDS
• Durban Strategy
• Gilad Shalit

• Human Shields
• International Humanitarian Law
• Lawfare
• Moral equivalency
• NGO Lack of Military Expertise

• pseudo-investigation
• War crimes
• Witness Testimony